As long as I’ve delved into the world of osteoarthritis, I might as well tackle another issue that regularly presents itself in my clinic: bone spurs.
At least one patient per week walks into my office with x-rays in hand showing bone spurs. Yes, they can be very problematic. But my experience is that--far more often than not--the cause of the patient’s pain is not the bone spur. The pain generator may be related to the spur (as with bursitis resulting from the compression of a bursa against the spur) or completely unrelated.
My view on health care is to treat as conservatively as possible and move to more aggressive types of therapy when the conservative ones fail. Because of this philosophy, I am (unfortunately) often at odds with another physician who may have recommended surgery to grind down the spur and, hence, do away with the patient’s pain.
To quote the Mayo Clinic (because they wrote this as succinctly and correctly as could be):
Most bone spurs cause no signs or symptoms. Often you don't even realize you have bone spurs until an X-ray for another condition reveals the growths.
While the presence of bone spurs does not equate to pain, it does mean that something abnormal is occurring in the bone/joint/tendon in question.
When I am able to rule out the scary causes of bone spurs (i.e. DISH, CPPD) I look for aberrant causes of stress: far too much or too little motion in a joint, strength imbalances, movement pattern deficiencies, etc.).
If you ever do find yourself with an x-ray of a bone spur, my advice is to find a health care provider that will determine WHY the spur is there. If you can figure out why the calcium deposited in the first place, you can work on treating the CAUSE rather than the SYMPTOM.